Mineral, WA. Murders
I picked this case first to post because of the proximity of
Ft. Lewis where I was stationed at the end of the 1990’s. I’ve visited Mt.
Rainier more than a few times during this period.
The case of Mike Riemer and Diana Robertson is one of the
eeriest and most puzzling unsolved mysteries of the 1980s, blending elements of
true crime, the wilderness, and an ominous message left behind. This is a
detailed account of their deaths and the chilling circumstances surrounding
their case.
On December 12, 1985, 36 year old Mike Riemer and 21 year old Diana Robertson along with
their two-year-old daughter, Crystal, set out on a trip into the forests of
Washington State. Their destination was the remote backwoods of Pierce County,
near the foothills of Mount Rainier. Mike, a roofer by trade, was also a
trapper and outdoorsman who frequently set traps for animals in the area.
Diana, his girlfriend, accompanied him that day, presumably to check traps, as
they had done before.
Also with them was their young daughter, Crystal Louise, a
bright-eyed toddler who was about to be at the center of a chilling mystery.
Later that same day, an unsettling discovery was made:
Crystal was found wandering alone inside a Kmart in Spanaway, Washington, about
30 miles away from the wilderness area where her parents had gone. The toddler
was seemingly unharmed, but she was unable to explain what had happened to her
parents. Being only two years old, she couldn’t provide any clear answers—only
vague statements about "Mommy being in the trees."
The police were immediately concerned. Where were Mike and
Diana? Who had left Crystal in the store, and why?
Fast forward, two months later, on February 18, 1986, a
hiker stumbled upon Diana Robertson’s body near a logging road in Mineral,
Washington. Her body was partially covered by a blanket, and nearby, police
found a blood-stained tube of lipstick and a manila envelope with the word
"Sorry" written on it in red ink.
Diana had been brutally stabbed 17 times, and authorities
noted that her cause of death was "homicidal violence." Next to her
body, there was also a stack of neatly placed sticks, a seemingly deliberate
act. Mike Riemer, however, was nowhere to be found. His truck, a red 1982
Plymouth pickup, was discovered about a mile from the crime scene, further
deepening the mystery.
With Diana’s murder confirmed and Mike missing,
investigators started to suspect that he had killed Diana and abandoned Crystal
before fleeing. There was some troubling background information that led police
to consider Mike as a suspect: he and Diana had a history of domestic violence,
and friends said their relationship was volatile. Some believed Mike may have
snapped, killed Diana, left their daughter in a safe public space, and then
vanished—either escaping or committing suicide in the woods.
However, there was no concrete evidence to support this, and
no sign of Mike's body. If he had fled or died in the wilderness, why wasn’t
there any trace of him?
YEARS passed with no sign of Mike, and people began
speculating whether he was truly the killer—or possibly another victim.
In a chilling turn, Diana’s murder was linked to another
unsolved double homicide from 1985. Earlier that same year, another couple,
Steven Harkins and Ruth Cooper, had been found murdered in the same general
area of Pierce County.
Harkins’ body was discovered in August 1985 at a campsite
with a gunshot wound to the head.
Cooper’s body was found two months later, in October, just
1.5 miles away. Like Diana Robertson, she had been stabbed in the chest.
The condition of Cooper’s body was eerily similar to
Diana’s—she was partially covered and found without shoes.
This meant that whoever had killed Harkins and Cooper might
also have been responsible for Diana’s murder. If that was true, then was Mike
also a victim rather than a murderer?
Then, in March 2011, a hiker in Lewis County, Washington,
made a shocking find: a human skull in the woods. Dental records soon confirmed
that the remains belonged to Mike Riemer.
The discovery threw the original murder theory into
question. Mike's remains were found about a mile from where Diana had been
discovered, suggesting that he had likely died in 1985—around the same time as
Diana. However, the cause of death could not be determined, and only his skull
was found. This left open several possibilities:
Mike had been murdered alongside Diana by an unknown killer.
Mike had killed Diana and then taken his own life in the
woods.
Mike had been attacked after fleeing the scene, possibly by
animals or another unknown person.
With so little evidence, authorities were unable to say
definitively whether Mike was a murderer or another victim. However, many now
lean toward the theory that a serial killer was responsible for the deaths of
both couples.
What did the word "Sorry" on the envelope mean?
Was it a confession from Mike, or something left by the true killer?
If Mike was innocent, why did he vanish without a trace for
decades?
Could the killer have been someone entirely unknown, lurking
in the Washington wilderness, preying on couples?
To this day, the case remains unsolved. While some still
believe that Mike Riemer was the killer, the discovery of his skull suggests
otherwise. If he was a victim, then his and Diana’s killer has never been
caught.
MY FINAL THOUGHTS:
The mystery of Mike Riemer and Diana Robertson is one of the
Pacific Northwest’s most unsettling unsolved cases. It has elements of a horror
story—a missing couple, a child left behind, and cryptic clues like the word
"Sorry" scrawled on an envelope.
Was this the work of an unknown serial killer hunting in the
Washington woods? Or did Mike have a tragic breakdown, killing Diana before
succumbing to the elements?
The truth may never be fully known. What happened in the forests of Pierce County in 1985 still haunts those who remember the case. Admittedly, I did not know much about this case when I first started typing this up. As of 2020, investigators were working to extract a DNA profile from Mike Riemer's remains to compare with DNA found on the ligature used to bind Diana Robertson's hands. They also planned to compare this profile to any DNA evidence from the earlier murders of Steven Harkins and Ruth Cooper. HOWEVER, the results of these DNA tests have not been publicly disclosed, leaving the case STILL unresolved.
Something tells me that either the DNA was so degraded that it couldn’t be used… or it wasn’t a match. An update would have been nice either way. I hate the fact that it seems resources were pushed back for nearly a decade, but I understand. Newer cases pop up with a higher probability of being solved rather than trying to solve a murder from the 80’s. What are your thoughts?
Comments
Post a Comment